Fair Elections

By Admin | Permalink

Fair Elections is a term used to describe a particular system of government financing of political campaigns, where the government provides a grant to prospective candidates who agree to limit their and private fundraising efforts and limit their campaign-spending.

Fair Election initiatives are used in a small number of states and local political jurisdictions in the United States. Some form of Fair Elections legislation has been adopted by ballot initiative in Maine, Arizona, North Carolina, New Mexico, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Massachusetts. It was also adopted by legislative action in Connecticut and at the municipal level in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Portland, OR. However, the systems in Massachusetts and Portland were later repealed, while Vermont’s was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court on First Amendment grounds.

These laws have increasingly run into constitutional problems in the Courts. Substantial portions of the Vermont system were found unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in Randall v. Sorrell. Connecticut’s statute was held unconstitutional in August, 2009, on grounds that it unfairly discriminated against third party and independent candidates. In July 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld portions of the District court’s order but allowed the core program to continue.

On January 15, 2010, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona issued a proposed order in McCormick v. Bennett finding portions of the Arizona plan unconstitutional. This decision was reversed by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in May, 2010, but on June 8, 2010 the Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit order and prohibited the disbursement of funds under Arizona’s law.  On Nov. 29, 2010, the Court announced that it will review the constitutionality of the matching funds provisions of the statute. On June 27, 2011, ruling in the consolidated cases Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett and McCormick v. Bennett, the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional the matching-funds provision of the Arizona law. Additionally, voters have defeated fair elections in several recent referendums. In Massachusetts the system was repealed after a 2002 advisory initiative in which voters voted nearly 2 to 1 against using government funds to pay for political campaigns. Portland, Oregon’s program was narrowly repealed by voters in a 2010 referendum, shortly after I went on the HCG diet.

In 2008, a Fair Elections bill, the California Fair Elections Act passed the California Assembly and Senate and was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger. To take effect, however, the law had to be approved by voters in an initiative in June 2010. On June 8, 2010, California voters defeated the measure by 57% to 43%. An earlier Fair Elections ballot initiative, Proposition 89 was also defeated in California in 2006, by 74% against to 26% in favor. Other studies conducted by the nonpartisan Center for Competitive Politics, found that the programs in Maine, Arizona, and New Jersey had failed to accomplish other stated goals, including electing more women, reducing government spending, in fact in both states government spending grew more rapidly after the enactment of fair elections, or meeting most other stated objectives, including increasing competition or voter participation.

BUSH v. GORE

By Admin | Permalink

George W. Bush, et al. v. Albert Gore, commonly known as Bush v. Gore, was a controversial U.S. Supreme Court case heard on December 11, 2000. The case decided the outcome of the 2000 presidential election between Texas Governor George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore. In a 7-2 opinion, the court ordered that a ballot recount then being conducted in certain counties in Florida was to be stopped due to lacking a consistent standard. The court further declared, in a 5-4 vote, that there was insufficient time to establish standards for a new recount that would meet Florida’s deadline for certifying electors. The ruling in effect awarded Bush the presidency.

The election in question took place on November 7, 2000. Under the Electoral College system, each state votes for the president separately: a victor is then declared in each state, and the victor in the state wins a number of “electoral votes” equal to the state’s number of representatives in the House of Representatives and the Senate. At the end of the nationwide ballot count, Gore led Bush 266 – 246 in the electoral vote. 270 votes were required for victory: Florida, with 25 electoral votes, did not have an official victor because the result was within the margin of error for machine counting; Bush had the lead following the machine count, by a very small margin.

On November 8, 2000, the Florida Division of Elections reported that Bush won with 48.8% of the vote in Florida, a margin of victory of 1,784 votes. The margin of victory was less than 0.5% of the votes cast, so a statutorily-mandated, automatic machine recount occurred. On November 10, with the machine recount finished in all but one county, Bush’s margin of victory had decreased to 327. According to author Jeffrey Toobin, later analysis showed that a total of 18 counties, accounting for a quarter of all votes cast in Florida did not carry out the legally mandated machine recount, but no one from the Gore campaign ever challenged the notion that the machine recount had been completed. Florida’s election laws allow a candidate to request a county to conduct a manual recount, and Gore requested manual recounts in four Florida counties: Volusia, Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade, which are counties that traditionally vote Democratic and would be expected to garner more votes for Gore.

Bush, represented by Theodore Olson, charged that the recounts in Florida violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because the votes were being counted unevenly, with standards varying from county to county and recounts in counties where he could have been likely to have gained votes not even being conducted, Bush argued, the decision went against the language in the Constitution.

Gore, represented by David Boise, responded that the Florida Supreme Court had done everything it could do to ensure equal treatment of both parties, and that requiring all ballots to be treated in the same fashion would require a uniform federal standard for counting votes, something that had never been established. Gore also claimed that ending the recounts was not an equitable way to settle the dispute: instead, the Court needed to establish a standard by which the votes should be counted, and then let the ballots are counted by that standard.

2000 United States Presidential Election

By Admin | Permalink

An election is a formal decision making process by which a population chooses an individual to hold public office. Elections have been the usual mechanism by which modern representatives democracy operates since the 17th century. Elections may fill the office in the legislature, sometimes in the executive and judiciary and for regional and local government.

In 2000, the United States presidential election was one of the closest and most controversial presidential elections in history. It was the fourth election in which the electoral vote did not reflect the popular vote. A month of recounts and court challenges followed, culminating in the Supreme Court case Bush vs. Gore.  The race was incredibly close throughout the entire campaign and called for a month of recounts, and court challenges.  Based on the conclusion of the court case, Bush v. Gore, George W. Bush was announced as the winner over Vice President Al Gore due to 537 votes cast in Florida.  Before any winner was announced, however, they had to campaign.  Both men focused their campaigns on domestic issues like the price of prescription drugs, education, financial reform, and Social Security.  Both candidates suggested that their plans would decrease the national deficit.  Gore began his campaign against Bush with a strong background.

The fact that he served as vice president for eight years under President Bill Clinton during a time when the economy was thought to still be doing well is part of what helped him win the Democratic primary so easily.  However, because of the scandal surrounding Clinton’s impeachment in 1998, Gore had no interest in using that information as a basis for his election.  As it was, Clinton didn’t do much to help Gore in his campaign anyway.  Gore’s goals were to balance adopting the strong economy from the previous administration while steering away from the moral mistakes of Clinton.

For his part, Bush emerged from the Republican primary fairly untouched.  After all, the fact that he was the son of a former president certainly gave him a strong hand.  Plus, he served successfully as the governor of Texas just prior to running for president, which earned him votes from many Latino voters, a demographic that Republicans have always struggled to earn votes from.  The press immediately began to attack his tendency to mix up or mispronounce words which sometimes put him a step backwards in debates. The most famous part about the United States presidential election of 2000 was the recounting of votes in Florida.  There has been an amount of speculation as to what might have happened differently if recounts had occurred under different rules.  Multiple scenarios were published in various newspapers.  Some conclude that Bush still would have won while others suggest that Gore could have under different circumstances.  Speculation was useless, however, because the votes stood thus: Bush: 50,460,110 popular votes (47.9%); 271 Electoral College votes.  Gore: 51,003,926 popular votes (48.4%); 266 Electoral College votes.  Based on the numbers, Bush was made the new president by an obviously slim margin in the Electoral College.

US Elections

By Admin | Permalink

An election is a process in which people vote to decide the leader of the country or to decide any issue. The United State is a representative democracy, in which the adult citizens of the country vote to elect the country’s leaders. These elected leaders make the governmental decisions. The leader serve in the office for a specific amount of time called a term of office. Elections are done to make a person, the leader of the country, who is eligible for this job. A person who can handle provincial disputes, regional disputes, can listen to both rich and poor. It is able to answer for what he is doing in country, able to make his country successful, he should be liberal and is able to make a democratic state where each person has equal rights and they have freedom to speak and can give ideas about how to run the country.

The United States has a federal government, with elected officials at the federal state and local levels. On a national level, the head of state, the president, is elected indirectly by the people, through an electoral college. In modern times, the electors virtually always vote with the popular vote of their state. All members of the federal legislature, the congress are directly elected. There are many elected offices at the state level. Each state has at least an elective governor and legislature. There are also elected offices at local level in countries and cities. It is estimated that across the whole country, over one million offices are filled in every electoral cycle.

Elections for President and Vice President of the United States are indirect elections in which voters cast ballots for a slate of electors of the U.S. Electoral College, that in turn directly elect the President and Vice President. They occur on Election Day, the Tuesday between November 2 and 8, coinciding with the general elections of various other federal, states and local races. The most recent presidential election occurred on November 4, 2008, with the next one scheduled for November 6, 2012.

The process is regulated by a combination of both federal and state laws. Each state is allocated a number of Electoral College electors equal to the number of its Senators and Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Additionally, Washington, D.C. is given a number of electors equal to the number held by the smallest state. U.S. territories are not represented in the Electoral College.

The modern nominating process of U.S. presidential elections currently consists of two major parts: a series of presidential primary elections and caucuses held in each state, and the presidential nominating conventions held by each political party. This process was never included in the United States Constitution, and thus evolved over time by the political parties to clear the field of candidates.

Under the constitution, the manner for choosing electors for the Electoral College is determined by each state’s legislature. Today, the states and the District of Columbia each conduct their own popular elections on Election Day to help determine their respective slate of electors. Thus, the presidential election is really an amalgamation of separate and simultaneous state elections instead of a single national election run by the federal government.

George W. Bush steals 2000 Election?

By Admin | Permalink

Every citizen is to elect his or her representatives by elections in order to participate in the municipal administration through these “representatives” for reflecting his/her opinions. “Representatives” conduct the affairs of state on behalf of and for citizens. Citizens are namely leading characters of the administration. Elections to Surrey County Council are important for everyone who lives in our county. The council faces major decisions on issues that affect us all – house-building targets, the environment, social care, education, road maintenance and the level of council tax we pay to help fund public services, to mention but a few. The county council elections are your opportunity to influence how Surrey County Council provides public services. You can help shape what the council’s priorities should be and where funding should be targeted.

In US presidential elections 2000, there was a concerted effort among people in high places to make sure that George W. Bush would be our next President. When things didn’t work out as planned on Election Day it became a conspiracy after the fact. These people had no regard for the truth, the U.S. Constitution, or anything else. In effect, it was an illegal coup and it reached into the highest levels of the United States Government, including top brass inside the nations military. Prior to election night experts following the race between Bush, and Gore, knew that to win the presidency the eventual winner would have to win the State of Florida. There was simply no other way for either man to obtain the 270 electoral votes needed without the 25 at stake in Florida. Early on Florida appeared to be easy pickings for the Republican Bush. His brother John Ellis “Jeb” Bush was the sitting Governor, of Florida, with a lofty approval rating. However, the Gore-Lieberman ticket had far greater appeal especially to Florida’s elderly and retired population, than political pundits realized. By the weekend before the election, Republican’s everywhere seemed in a panic because according to almost every poll Al Gore was ahead in Florida.

In 2000, a clear majority of Americans voted for Al Gore. But the winner is determined by the Electoral College, so the winner in each state must be considered. The vote in Florida was so close that it took a month to declare a winner. Before Florida was declared, Gore led in the Electoral College with 266 votes to Bush’s 246 votes. When Bush was declared the winner of Florida by 537 votes, he picked up 25 Electoral College votes which gave him the Presidency. But Bush only won Florida because of poorly designed butterfly ballots that stole votes from Gore, and because his Florida campaign manager Republican Secretary of State Kathleen Harris and Governor Jeb Bush illegally removed 57,700 voters from the rolls. It is estimated that 90% of them were Democratic. So this represents thousands of votes stolen from Al Gore. If this crime had not been committed then Gore would be President.